Posts Tagged ‘ Gospel

Sermon: 1 Timothy 1:1-3

My sermon from Sunday evening is posted over at the Tacoma BPC site.

It’s an introductory sermon.  As far as introductory sermons go, they can be really good, or really bad.  The really bad ones are basically history lessons.  You get background information about the city, the economic conditions, what was happening elsewhere in the world at the time the letter was written.  Who was emperor, what their reign looked like, etc.  All this might be interesting, but if it’s the meat of your sermon, you missed the mark.  Widely.  After all, we’re called to preach Christ Jesus.

Here’s how I went about it.  First, who is Paul writing to?

Timothy, duh.  But not only Timothy.  His declaration of his apostleship is an indicator that this pastoral epistle was meant to be read by more than just Pastor Timothy, but by the churches in the region, as was customary or the apostolic epistles.  Timothy didn’t need the reminder that Paul was an apostle.  With that bit of info we’re able to look at who Timothy was (and shake the idea that he’s nothing mroe than a weak-stomached inexperienced Pastor unable to decide what he should do next).  We also get to look at the authority of Scripture every time we do a sermon on an epistles introduction.

The gospel meat of the message has to do with Paul’s specific decision to show Jesus as coequal with God the Father as well as his declaration that he’s working under marching orders from God  (both found in 1 Timothy 1:1).  Paul isn’t writing this epistle just because he loves Timothy as a true son, but because Christ has commanded him to do so according to the office he called Paul into.

Unbelievers have marching orders from God.  They are to turn away from sin via repentance and put their faith in Jesus Christ (Acts 2:38, Acts 3:19, 2 Peter 3:9, to name a few instances).

Believers have marching orders from God too, and 1 Timothy deals with a number of them.  So the message calls for repentance and obedience through the proclamation of the Gospel as well as an exhortation to serve Christ in love by remembering what the standing orders God has given us are (think Commission, Great).

Give it a listen. Let me know what you think, about this post or about the sermon in general.

Went to a Church with a Man with No Name…

He probably didn't dress like that.

I preached the final sermon on the book of Ruth chapter 4 yesterday morning.

The man with no name (the redeemer who opts not to take on Naomi & Ruth) is a good illustration of many in the church today.  He’s willing to serve Christ… to a point.  When all he was required to do was put some money up front and take care of an old woman, he was all about it.  In fact, he might even get ahead on the deal.  After Naomi dies, he’s got some extra land all to himself, since she didn’t have any sons to inherit it.  But when Boaz revealed the fine print (Ruth came along with the purchase, and he would have to provide an heir for Naomi) the man with no name backed out of the deal.

The nameless man saw his finances getting stretched, his inheritance diminishing and said the cost was too high.  Boaz had no such qualms and continued to serve the Lord by providing for the poor and the needy – he’d been helping Ruth & Naomi for a while, all without even a whiff of personal gain.

So it is with following Christ.  We’re slack when it comes to counting the cost of discipleship (Luke 14:28-33).  Instead of cultivating a life where we seek to glorify God (even, gasp! at a personal cost) we cultivate a life where we’ll only go so far.  Love your neighbor unless they’re just too annoying.  Love one another so long as they meet your personal marks for piety, competence, or personality.  Make disciples so long as you’ve got the time, etc.  The Christian who lives like this, will be nameless, while the believer who seeks to honor Christ by loving Him and keeping His commands will, like Boaz, be known.

Also: Boaz totally “gets” the importance of having a godly, Proverbs 31 kind of wife.

Also, Also: God is amazing & incomprehensible and Christ’s suffering and love for us are brought into a clear perspective via this chapter.  Let me know what you think.

Ruth Finds Redemption, is available for streaming or downloading on the TBPC website.

Different Hearers. Same Gospel.

While reading the second volume of David Calhoun’s fantastic book, Princeton Seminary: The Majestic Testimony, I came across this helpful piece of teaching by A. A. Hodge.

Hodge compared the difference between “hearers of the same gospel.” “A” became a Christian, and “B” did not. Why? Hodge answered:

The Pelagian says – “A’s purpose was sufficient: he willed it, and he became a Christian.”

The Semi-Pelagian says – “A did his best, and God helped him.”

The Arminian says – “A used the gracious ability, the prevenient grace, give by God to all, while B did not.”

The Lutheran says – “A and B both needed prevenient and cooperating grace. Neither could cooperate, but either might resist. B did resist, while A did not. Hence the difference.”

The Calvinist says – “A was regenerated by the grace of Almighty God.”

On Sickness and Health

3 John 3:2 – Beloved, I pray that all may go well with you and that you may be in good health, as it goes well with your soul.

Small talk, I find, centers on a few choice but universally accepted topics. Sports and weather are both staples.  Another is health.  Particularly if the person being spoken to is or has recently been ill. Or perhaps think that they will be ill.

Thomas Boston said “O what a shame is it for thee to sit down in company, and rise again, and part with them, and never a word of Christ to be heard where thou art ?”

I inquire regularly on my brother and sister’s health. It’s an easy piece of conversation. It’s a good thing to wish someone well, but too often things are left at a physical level.  Too often I take the time to chit-chat about well being and make no word in relation to the state of their soul.  I want those to be well that I talk to.  I want even more for their souls to be well.  So why is it that I so often get it backwards when conversation begins?

Dreams & Instincts

Dreams & Instincts (Jude 6-8). I have a blog? Huh. Well, here’s the last sermon I preached…

Dreams & Instincts

Jude 5-10

5 But I want to remind you, though you once knew this, that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe. 6 And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but left their own abode, He has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day; 7 as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
8 Likewise also these dreamers defile the flesh, reject authority, and speak evil of dignitaries. 9 Yet Michael the archangel, in contending with the devil, when he disputed about the body of Moses, dared not bring against him a reviling accusation, but said, “The Lord rebuke you!” 10 But these speak evil of whatever they do not know; and whatever they know naturally, like brute beasts, in these things they corrupt themselves.